Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login
 
Years of scholarly instruction can make your writing technically correct; Wordophilia can help you give your words more meaning. From vocabulary to style, grammar to creativity - a place for writers of all kinds to read about and discuss their craft.

Writers' Advice Sucks

March 31st 2009 20:56
Advice

That may seem like an incredibly stupid thing to say on a blog about writing, where the majority of posts are advice. In a way, it is. On the other hand, it's very easy to forget that the vast majority of web sites giving advice to writers are built and maintained by people who only know a tiny bit more than their readers. Like any craft, there are some experts, but there are also loads of noobs.

It's equally easy to read advice on writing sites and switch off our acceptance criteria, much like people reading a newspaper and accepting the information therein as fact. Active minds should not do this: question the advice and be sure it works for you, or you may damage your creativity. Personally, a lot of the advice doesn't suit me at all.

For example, almost every writing site will tell you at least these things: write every day, don't edit until it's done, carry a notebook for ideas, write rather than think and set goals.

The first of these, "write every day", is a contradiction to that other tenet of online advisors: that real writers are people who need to write. On the one hand, they're saying that if you're really a writer and not just some dumb schmuck pretending to be one, then you should be writing all the time. Then, on the other hand, they say you should begin a habit of writing every day. Surely this is unnecessary, since - being a real writer - it's unusual for you to be doing anything else?

Personally, I could never force myself to write every day. I might do it anyway (and pretty much do), but making it a requirement would kill the fun entirely. It would become like a kind of religious penance for past sins of watching too many B-movies or something. I say write what you feel like, when you feel like it. Enjoy it.

"Don't edit until it's done" is another piece of advice I simply can't take. I'm too much of a grammar Nazi. I re-read sentences while I'm typing and go back to alter them. This, however, is a very personal situation and a lot of people find that it blocks them from continuing. Only you know whether that's the case: if it is, leave the editing for later.

As for the idea of carrying a notebook for ideas, well - that's some good advice for people who work like that. It's the same as making lists of things in a sort of 'individual brainstorming' activity: by jotting down everything that occurs to you, you remove the risk of forgetting it later, or it may lead to more ideas. Me? I'm a geek: I don't use real-world paper. I don't keep lists anywhere except in my head. I am a man-machine, a cyborg entity with 4Kb of memory. (No, I don't use notebooks.)

My favorite advice is the next one. "Write rather than think." This one is the biggest myth of all: the idea that not keeping ideas and turning them over in your head, trying to perfect them is a good thing. Let it all out. Just sit down and scribble, without any heed for what spews forth from the end of your pen (or fingers if you're typing). Once it's done, you can go back and see what you did, edit it and get something good for your efforts.

That may work for people on LSD, but it doesn't for me. It ties in to the common view of authors as wildly creative, hippy-like beings, floating around in their silky skirts (or enormously flared corduroys) and magically creating profound utterances by the simple act of taking the lid off a pen. I have yet to meet someone like that, though I'd very much like to - even if it were just so I could be jealous (not of the flares).

Train-of-thought writing is very good advice for people who can do it. Many of us can't and the important thing is not to feel bad about it. I have to turn things over in my head. The Prologue to one of my ongoing novel attempts took me a month to write, and it didn't appear on (virtual) paper for the first three weeks. Why should I feel bad about that? It's one of the best things I've ever written, in my own distorted opinion.

Setting goals is the last item on the list and is a difficult one. Many writers set themselves completely unrealistic goals - often deliberately, in an attempt to push themselves. I suppose the success of this activity depends on the way the individual works. Setting a huge, scary goal can indeed help by being very exciting and the feeling of success if the goal is achieved can be enormous. Choosing smaller goals provides less recompense, but can still be very important.

My concern with that advice is that it often doesn't take into account that many writers are also mothers, husbands, full-time workers (or carers, in my case) and have a lot to do apart from sitting down quietly and focussing on their text. It's good advice, in moderation.

All in all, the important thing to remember is that advice is just that: an opinion on activities that could possibly help you to improve your work. Keep your brain switched on, take it all with a pinch (or small continent) of salt and choose the things that work for you.

119
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   

   

   


Comments
13 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Laura Thom

March 31st 2009 22:17
Great post!!! I always set goals for my writing and recently I have been achieving them. It is hard work but is rewarding.

Comment by Samantha Elley

March 31st 2009 23:41

Comment by Spike 2

March 31st 2009 23:46
I tried setting goals for a while, but real life always kicked me in the proverbials and made it impossible to meet them. About the only one I have left now is "post on one blog a day, at least"!!

Comment by Wilson Pon

April 1st 2009 06:44
Don't edit until it's done

Well, Spike. It's easier said than done. It seems that we both share the bad habit, where we cannot withstand with all the grammatical errors. That's why we love to edit while we're writing, which it's definitely not recommended to the amateur writers!


Comment by Janet Collins

April 1st 2009 07:17
"Don't edit until it's done"

I'm with you on that one but for a different reason. If something is just not right and I haven't really written it properly then the rest of it isn't going to flow and certainly won't if I leave it till the end to edit it.

I can understand that it uses up a lot of time going over and over a few paragraphs and not moving on but I believe you have to edit a least a little bit on the way through.

I'm with you on the lists and the notebook too but I think I am going to have to get into a habit of making lists as my memory isn't quite as sharp as it used to be.

Your advice is always pretty good advice to me.



Comment by Spike 2

April 1st 2009 08:52
Wilson: We should open a Grammar Nazi club. You know, sell hats and badges and stuff... might have a problem with the name, though.

Janet: I should probably make lists, to be honest - same thing with age. I just can't do it, though. It seems so much effort unless it's a shopping list or something normal. (And thank you for the compliment, *blush.*)

Comment by Whitney

April 1st 2009 12:58
Great advice. I agree that if you force yourself to write and make it a chore, it's not as fun and you get burnt out rather quickly. I tried that. Actually tried to turn it into a game where I'd pick a random word each day to write about, the next day I gave myself the option of continuing the previous days work or a new word. I made myself write a page each night. Then at the end of the week, I had to pick one of the words from that week and write two pages, continuing the story. After about a month of that, I was bored. It was fun while it lasted. It was a great way to wind down at the end of the day, that's for sure.

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 1st 2009 14:02
I write almost every day without thinking about it too... I do some initial editing as I go, but leave certain sections to be doctored after I am finished with them, because I don't always put all the information I need to for the reader when I am excited about writing something down. That is, I keep certain words and phrases which I take for granted belong in a particular arrangement, but I rush onto the next formation before I thoroughly exhaust the possibilities of the present. Perhaps I should think more upon this, and why I do it - is it really rewarding? Am I hiding from something?
At any rate, I'm on a creative writing kick at the moment...

Best of luck with your novel.

Comment by Spike 2

April 1st 2009 19:23
Whitney: Blimey, you're dedicated. I don't think I'd have lasted very long on that scheme. Neat idea, though. I like that a lot.

PmC: Hah! Sounds like exactly the same thing I do - forgetting to cover everything, then realising too late. The advantage of leaving it overnight and re-reading in the morning, I guess! Sometimes there's too much to say and we whizz through it.

The novel's not really going anywhere, to be honest. Real life keeps me from advancing.

Comment by Cibbuano

April 1st 2009 21:29
you might enjoy this: Merlin Mann talking about how he changed gears on his idea on creativity...

Basically, he admits that he spent so much time on the ideas on HOW to stimulate creativity and be productive, that he didn't have any time to actually do the work. Creative people, he says, are going to be creative no matter where they are...

Comment by Postmodern Critic

April 2nd 2009 06:12
The product of a restless mind, perhaps?

Hang in there with your novel, things will pick up!

Comment by Spike 2

April 2nd 2009 10:20
Ciiby: Isn't that just another contradiction? "Creative people will always be creative, but I wasn't because I was so busy on other stuff." Erm, duh. That's the same as the "writers need to write" thing in my book - an ideal that really only serves to make the strugglers feel bad about struggling. Maybe I'm just cynical when people spout about creativity and use buzzwords...

PmC: I remember a teacher at school who used to harangue one student for his appalling handwriting (it really was very bad). The problem was that the student was a near-genius: his ideas went so fast, his hand had trouble keeping up. Thankfully the teacher realised that, so switched to suggesting he make quick notes, THEN write!

Comment by Spike 2

April 2nd 2009 10:47
Gave it a shot, Cib: sorry, but I only got about ten minutes in. He's just SO dull and uninteresting. Yeesh. No delivery, no personality, just droning crap like "I know this sounds really horribly ironic and maybe a little fractal..." Ugh.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
12 Posts
97 Posts dating from January 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by SpikeTheLobster
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]