Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
Years of scholarly instruction can make your writing technically correct; Wordophilia can help you give your words more meaning. From vocabulary to style, grammar to creativity - a place for writers of all kinds to read about and discuss their craft.

Proofing And Editing

March 11th 2009 15:33
Pen and Ink

In the world of writing, there are some basic confusions that seem to propagate with time, distance, language barriers and whether or not it's Tuesday. One of these is the responsibilities of two different people who read a nearly-finished piece of work: the editor and the proofreader. Many people - including those posting freelance jobs on various sites - believe they are the same role under two different names. They're not.

An editor (or copy-editor) is the person with the harder job. Their role is to take a piece of text - an article, a story, a book or whatever - and transform it into something that flows smoothly. They look at the bigger picture, trying to determine whether the author's point is well-expressed or if a reader would understand it better were it formulated differently. The editors of the world are the true wordsmiths: they tear a piece of writing down to its component ideas and rebuild it, piece by piece, until it feels right. They will rewrite or remove some of the content and work very closely with the original authors.

A proofreader usually steps in at the last stage, just before publishing. Their job is not to determine whether the paragraphs are in the right order or whether the author's intention is one thing or another. They are correctors: their role consists of going over every letter of every word, every punctuation mark and every conjugated verb to hammer out every single error that remains in the text - even those missed by the editor. They are the geeky technicians, the "grammar Nazis" who will argue whether that colon should be a period or not.

The editor usually sees the work before the proofreader, and often sees it in a native state: that is, unformatted for the final presentation. The proofreader generally checks the work after it has been formatted and prepared for publication, so their job also entails verifying alignment, page breaks, columns and other layout details.

Both roles are expected to correct many of the basic problems, such as grammar, punctuation, spelling, subject-verb agreements, hyphens, capitalisation, abbreviations and any obvious mistakes, such as a character's name changing part-way through a story.

In some cases, there is an additional overlap of the two roles. Proofreaders are frequently expected to spot bad writing and bring it to the attention of their employer or the author. They are not generally expected to rewrite the content, though, unless specifically requested - this is because such activity would be [well-spotted, Zabeena!] stepping on the editor's toes!

In the job market, be it online or bricks-and-mortar, it is always worth checking exactly where the boundaries of the role lie before committing yourself to the task. And make sure your pay reflects your efforts.

97
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
10 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Mistersmith

March 12th 2009 01:17
Hi Spike
Teresa here!
I was confused about this too until it was explained to me but I was told that the proofreader is the absolute final stage before printing and the chief purpose of proofreading is to make sure that the copy is going to transfer properly to the printed page - taking into account page numbers to ensure chapters beginning on right hand, etc Presumably online publishing is a bit diffferent. Anyway, you seem to know quite a bit. What is your background? (you may have said already, but I missed it).

Comment by Anonymous

March 12th 2009 10:23
Hi Spike,
there is a 'be' missing in your penulltimate paragraph.
wbr
Zabeena

Comment by Spike 2

March 12th 2009 14:01
Hi Teresa. Generally, you're spot on - the proofer checks the layout just before it goes to press (and content, just in case!). Online is different, but then most companies have their own procedures anyway!

When I was editing/proofing at wargamer.com, they kept to the magazine style, though: the editor edited, the proofer looked at the content on the actual web pages before they went live - to check links, format, numbering and so on as well as a final run over the text.

Zabeena: It's always on the posts about editing and being 100% perfect that I miss a word. Sigh. I'll edit that, thank you!

Comment by James Rickard

March 12th 2009 16:00
Great info. There IS a difference! A lot of people don't know the difference but I certainly did when I began getting published. (Not that I'm paying rent on payment!) When it comes to proofing my own stuff, I'm LOUSY. It must be mental problem--I know what it's supposed to say and that's what I see. On the other hand, I can proof anyone other work with no problem.

Comment by James Rickard

March 12th 2009 16:02
There's an example. (No joke) It's supposed to be "anyone's work."

Comment by Spike 2

March 12th 2009 16:11
Hi James. They say (whoever 'they' are) that you should always have someone else do the editing and proofing for that very reason.

It reminds me of an old 'drunk driving' sign. It read like this:

IF YOU CAN'T
SEE WHAT'S WRONG
THIS WITH SIGN
YOU SHOULDN'T BE DRIVING

Brilliant. And yes, it took me about five minutes to spot it, even though I wasn't drunk!!

Comment by Janet Collins

March 13th 2009 11:26
I think this is why Orble suggest - and even insist - that you always preview your posts first as well. If you don't you often can't tell the "i"s from the "l"s but when it's on a go-slow this is very laborious and very boring!.

Comment by Mistersmith

March 14th 2009 01:40
Hey Janet,
If my computer is going really slow, I include another activity - like shaving my legs.

Comment by Spike 2

March 14th 2009 09:48
Teresa:How do you shave your legs with a computer? Must be terribly unwieldy...

Comment by Mistersmith

March 15th 2009 02:26
Yes, Spike, that was very lazy of me. Imagine if your 1st language wasn't English!
Chris could use this on his bloggercises: How the order of words can dramatically alter the meaning.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
12 Posts
97 Posts dating from January 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by SpikeTheLobster
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]