Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
Years of scholarly instruction can make your writing technically correct; Wordophilia can help you give your words more meaning. From vocabulary to style, grammar to creativity - a place for writers of all kinds to read about and discuss their craft.

Antiheroes And Character Flaws

March 3rd 2009 23:21
Charles Bronson
Charles Bronson

The concept of heroism has changed dramatically over the last century or so. When Superman first appeared in Action Comics, for example, heroism was still more of an altruistic goal: a 'knight' using every and all strengths to protect the weak, to defend justice and to promote the ideals of the time. More recently, comic heroes such as Batman have altered our perception. A vigilante, fighting crime and performing good deeds is still a hero; yet at the same time the underlying reasons for his actions are definitely questionable. Film heroes have done the same, such as Charles Bronson's portrayal of Paul Kersey in the Death Wish series.

The antihero has been around for a long time - as far back as Shakespeare and beyond: Macbeth is an excellent example. As times have changed and become more complex, and the population in general trust previously unquestioned authority less and less, the 'noble criminal' or 'outlaw seeking justice' has become more and more popular. In fact, these days the 'true' heroic values that existed in stories such as the King Arthur legend are almost dead.

This does not mean that a flawed hero has to be an antihero, if the latter does not fit well in a particular story. There is definitely a middle ground, often populated by everyday characters who are forced by circumstance to display heroic traits. Thankfully, the vast majority of individuals still appreciate such virtues and aspire to emulate them in real life. This, in itself, can be an incredible force in writing: a character displaying heroic virtue can grasp a reader's attention with such strength that an author's message is much easier to transmit, no matter how weak or flawed the character is in other departments.

In fact, tangible weakness can augment an act of heroism. A good example of this is in the modern trend of stories with children as their main hero. For example, the film Pay It Forward takes a weak central individual - a child - and turns him into a shining example of heroism. The child's tenacity and sacrifice in holding true to his ideal touches the viewer in a way that it would not, were he a full-grown adult with money and muscle to spare.

It is important, however, to choose character flaws carefully. Readers still need to identify with a central lead, at least to some extent. To have an antihero who is beyond the comprehension of most 'normal' people requires an enormous amount of skill and should not be attempted lightly. Succeeding can pay off, though - Hannibal Lecter in Silence Of The Lambs (and the other books) is a very good indication of how such choices can work well.

76
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
5 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Damo

March 4th 2009 04:07
The enti hero
Start with a character you do not like and give him an act of redemption to make us like him.

The Antagonist
Start with someone we like and slow reveal his underlying evil so we hate him.

Reverse journeys

Comment by Spike 2

March 4th 2009 13:08
"Start with a character you do not like" - hmm, I don't think so, not necessarily. In most cases, yes, but a lot of the antiheroes these days are characters of whom we're distrustful or simply undecided. Take ''The Punisher', for example: he's pretty darned dodgy, but we didn't start out disliking him. Maybe I'm wrong... there's so many, it's hard to generalise!

Comment by Janet Collins

March 4th 2009 13:22
Interesting how the hero has evolved, isn't it?

Comment by Spike 2

March 4th 2009 16:58
It is indeed, Janet. I sometimes wonder how a 'Sir Lancelot' figure (without the adultery part!) would be seen in modern times. We're at a point now where a hero with no flaws is seen virtually with contempt. The one exception for me is Superman, who has always been pure and perfect - but even he's been tainted at times.

I suppose it's because we like our stories more 'gritty' and real these days. Perfect people don't exist, so we have trouble believing them, maybe?

Comment by Cibbuano

March 5th 2009 23:08
perhaps modern audiences are more skeptical of 'pure' heroes, as the public figures in our lives have often been struck down by controversy.


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
12 Posts
97 Posts dating from January 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by SpikeTheLobster
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]